Tags

, , , , , , ,

Director Stephen Spielberg speaking at the Pen...

Image via Wikipedia

By RENE RODRIGUEZ
McClatchy Newspapers
By RENE RODRIGUEZ
Updated: 2011-12-22T00:48:26Z

DreamWorks
Director Steven Spielberg (right) and his star, Jeremy Irvine, on the set of “War Horse.”
More News
From ‘50/50’ to ‘Tree of Life,’ these 10 films told their stories well Reznor takes novel approach to ‘Dragon Tattoo’ score Tom Cruise tops a quiet Christmas weekend at the box office Oscar loves movies about movies ‘Prometheus’ director is done with ‘xenomorph’ aliens ‘Artist’ creator Michel Hazanavicius loves sound of silents ‘Marilyn’ actor Branagh parallels his character Animals take over the holiday box office ‘Mission: Impossible’ sequel could be a sure thing at box office Englewood Theatre reopens with ‘Sound of Music’ To direct Damon, ‘Zoo’ director turns on the soundtrack Movie Mom | ‘The Artist,’ ‘War Horse,’ ‘We Bought a Zoo’ Winning over the world, with barely a word ‘Dragon Tattoo’ pierces box office with $1.6 million in Tuesday debut Free films, special shows, Dec. 23-29 ‘War Horse’: Lovable horse, scenery to die for | 3 stars With two new films, Spielberg hopes to reclaim his crown Movie Mom | ‘Dragon Tattoo,’ ‘Tintin’ Little-known actress Rooney Mara is about to get famous 10 things you should know about ‘Tintin’ A couple of years ago, Steven Spielberg was attending a horse show with his daughter when some kids recognized him and came over to say hello.
“They started saying ‘Oh, man, we love your movies so much! We love all your films — except for that last Indiana Jones picture. We all hated that one!’ ” Spielberg recalls, laughing.
“I asked them ‘Why did you hate it?’ And they said, ‘It just wasn’t as good as the other ones. We didn’t like that alien thing at the end. That was stupid. He shouldn’t be going after aliens anyway. He should be going after archeology stuff.’ ”
Spielberg is familiar with that sentiment. “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” was the worst-reviewed film in the series that “Raiders of the Lost Ark” launched. Even Shia LaBeouf, who starred in it, has publicly trashed the film.
Just don’t expect Spielberg to apologize for it.
“Then those same kids told me they saw ‘Crystal Skull’ four times,” he says. “I asked ‘Why did you see it four times if you hated it?’ And they said ‘For all the good stuff in it.’ And suddenly I understood how that movie made $800 million, despite all the negative things I read about it.”
Ever since “Jaws” redefined the limits on how profitable a movie can be, Spielberg has balanced commerce with art: He’s one of the most gifted artists to ever walk onto a movie set, as influential and revered as Alfred Hitchcock and John Ford and Stanley Kubrick. But Spielberg is also one of the sharpest and most shrewd businessmen in Hollywood, arguably second only to his friend and frequent producing partner George Lucas.
Both sides of Spielberg’s persona are invading a multiplex near you. On Wednesday came “The Adventures of Tintin,” the director’s first foray into 3-D. The first of a planned series of films based on the comic books by the Belgian author Herge, “Tintin” has already grossed $233 million overseas, where the eponymous hero, an intrepid newspaper reporter, is as entrenched in the culture as deeply as Peanuts is beloved in the U.S. The movie, which uses the same motion-capture effects James Cameron employed in “Avatar,” is a relentless thrill-ride replete with eye-popping 3-D effects, astonishing animation and sustained action sequences worthy of “Raiders of the Lost Ark.”
“War Horse” follows on Sunday, a grand, bold epic based on Michael Morpurgo’s novel about the bond between a young man (played by Jeremy Irvine) and his horse, set during World War I. The PG-13 movie has the intensity and power of “Saving Private Ryan” (without the gore) and the wonder and depth of feeling of “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.” It is an unabashedly earnest, hopeful, moving work, and if some people may find the movie too sentimental for these cynical times, you get the sense that Spielberg doesn’t really care.
“We were moved to tears by it,” Spielberg says about the first time he and his wife, actress Kate Capshaw, saw the award-winning stage play based on the book in London’s West End. “That was at the start of 2010. My producer Kathleen Kennedy and I bought the rights to the book, and we started pre-production on the movie the next day. We hired (screenwriter) Richard Curtis two weeks later. I saw the play in January, and I was shooting the movie in August.”
Spielberg also optioned the rights to the “War Horse” stage play by Nick Stafford, which won five Tonys and used remarkably life-like puppets to stand in for Joey, the titular hero of the film. The theatrical production gave Spielberg a way to adapt the novel without turning it into an epic-sized episode of “Mr. Ed.”
“The novel is narrated by a horse, which is a wonderful device for a children’s book, but it wouldn’t work in a motion picture,” Spielberg says. “I ruled that out immediately and took the approach the stage play took. Because you can’t really have a horse speaking English.”
Another filmmaker might have used Morpurgo’s book as the backdrop for a story about the toll and horrors of war. But Spielberg, who has devoted as many movies to historical conflicts as he has to aliens and the suburbs, didn’t think of “War Horse” that way. His approach was far simpler and purer, which explains why some critics are already grumbling about the film being too schmaltzy.
“The war is the cause and the effect of the separation between boy and horse,” Spielberg says. “But what the story is really about is the personality of that horse and the determination and courage of that boy. This is a movie about how people are profoundly affected by animals in the middle of a horrible war. It is more about eye contact than huge epic battles scenes. Although there is certainly one of those.”
At an age when most people slow down to enjoy the fruits of their successes, Spielberg, who turned 65 on Sunday, is speeding up instead. He is already deep into production on “Lincoln,” his long-in-the-works movie about Abraham Lincoln, starring Daniel Day-Lewis and slated to arrive in December 2012. He is expected to follow that up with “Robopocalypse,” an adaptation of Daniel H. Wilson’s best-selling novel about an attack on mankind by robots.
“I like to work very quickly, because the faster I work, the clearer I can see the movie,” Spielberg says. “If I work too slow, I lose my sense of rhythm, and I can’t see how the movie is coming together. But if I’m really shooting on the run, and the crew is moving quickly, and the actors are fully prepared, and we’re doing four or five takes instead of 20, I have complete lucidity about the story from beginning to end. That is the demon I battle when I direct: losing my objectivity.”
Screenwriter Steven Zaillian, who won an Oscar collaborating with Spielberg on “Schindler’s List,” says the filmmaker won’t roll the cameras until he is “absolutely comfortable” with every page of the shooting script.
“Steven will say things like ‘I don’t know exactly what, but there’s something not quite right about this scene.’ And I would keep working on it until he would say ‘Yeah, that’s it.’ And once the script is finished, he shoots it. That’s the greatest thing for a screenwriter: working with a director who won’t say ‘Oh, we’ll worry about that later and just improvise something.’ Steven doesn’t do that. And then, obviously, what he brings to every scene on a visual level is extraordinary.”
Spielberg’s success earned him the ability to produce other people’s films, almost always in genres that are dear to him, and as one of the principal partners of DreamWorks Studios, he is a Hollywood mogul, too. As a result, Spielberg’s name has constantly graced movie screens, even during the rare patches when he took time off from directing. The list of films he has helped get made reads like a shopping list of late 20th-century pop culture: “Back to the Future,” “Gremlins,” “Men in Black,” “The Goonies,” “Cape Fear,” “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”
This year alone, Spielberg was an executive producer on “Cowboys & Aliens” and “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” and an active collaborator with J.J. Abrams on “Super 8.” He even made a voice cameo in “Paul,” a comedic homage to 1980s-era Spielberg sci-fi. And other times, he will offer creative input on other people’s films behind the scenes, as he did with “Paranormal Activity” and the first “Shrek.”
“Sometimes I’ll take the title of executive producer on a movie knowing the value of my name,” Spielberg says. “With ‘Cowboys & Aliens,’ Ron Howard and I decided to help package the movie and assign ourselves a credit just to give a little more awareness to this very expensive, yet very experimental, genre-crunching movie.
“ ‘Super 8’ was different. J.J. Abrams and I were trying to figure out what we could make together, and we came up with the idea of making a movie about kids making movies, which is what we both did when were teenagers. J.J. came up with the concept of some huge thing getting out after a train crashes, and only the kids know about it because they’ve got this Zapruder film to prove it. But I was very active on ‘Super 8’ from beginning to end. I am very proud of it.
“Although some people were critical of J.J. trying to imitate my earlier movies and perhaps falling short, he was never trying to (pay) homage to me. I think I just rubbed off on him a little, because we had so many story meetings together. He shouldn’t be blamed for the pollen I put on his wings. I don’t consider that homage. If anything, I would rather take the blame for that.”
But even though his producing duties would be enough to keep him occupied, Spielberg remains as enthusiastic and curious about filmmaking as he did at the start of his career. “War Horse” and “The Adventures of Tintin” open in theaters within days of each other, but this is not the first time he has directed two films in the same year. He did it in 1993, with “Schindler’s List” and “Jurassic Park”; in 1997, with “The Lost World” and “Amistad”; in 2002, with “Minority Report” and “Catch Me If You Can”; and in 2005, with “War of the Worlds” and “Munich.”
He is the most prolific of all the A-list directors — by comparison, James Cameron has only directed eight feature films in his entire career — and when you mention these double-feature years, Spielberg himself offers up one more.
“I also did it with ‘E.T.’ and ‘Poltergeist’; they came out a week apart,” he says, accidentally reviving the long-standing suspicion that he played an even bigger role in the making of 1982’s “Poltergeist” than writer and producer (Tobe Hooper is officially credited as director of the film). Spielberg has made this slip before — he once apologized for it in a letter to Time magazine that read “Tobe Hooper alone was the director” — and he says it yet again when talking about the decision to release “Tintin” and “War Horse” only five days apart.
“As I was nearing the end of production on ‘War Horse,’ I was also starting to approve or send back animation of ‘Tintin,’ and I realized both films were going to come out very close together, as close as ‘Poltergeist’ and ‘E.T.,’ ” he says. “But even though ‘War Horse’ and ‘Tintin’ are family oriented, they are still different enough that audiences can make a choice of which one they want to see first but not at the expense of skipping the other one.”
“War Horse” and “Tintin” also showcase the skills that elevate Spielberg to the ranks of the all-time great directors, particularly his uncanny knack for constantly putting his camera in the best, most compelling place to tell his story. In “War Horse,” he draws a genuine performance out of his four-legged star (actually played by six horses) primarily by the ways in which he photographs the animal. In “Tintin,” freed from all constraints of gravity and physics, Spielberg performs impossible feats with his camera, including an astounding action sequence, done in one long, uninterrupted take, that makes you want to stand up and applaud.
“To me, the camera is an extension of the way I see things,” Spielberg says. “On every movie I’ve ever made since the beginning of my career — ‘The Sugarland Express,’ ‘Duel,’ even all my television shows — I have never let the director of photography place the camera anywhere. I do all the camera placements, I select the lens; I select the angle; I determine the blocking; I move the actors and the camera around. The cinematographer simply lights. That is all I need them for.
“Janusz Kaminski is the greatest lighting cameraman I have ever met in my life. But he never sets the camera: I do. I think my movies would start to look different if I did what many other directors do — which is perfectly fine to do — and abdicated that job. I don’t think I will ever do that, because it is one thing that keeps me very connected to my movies.”
That connection keeps Spielberg pushing forward on the same personal path he’s always followed. He just happens to take a route that movie audiences around the world are happy to take along with him.
“I’ve always had a chance to make every movie I’ve wanted to make,” he says. “The success of ‘Jaws’ and ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’ allowed me to pursue subjects the studios were afraid of, because they were too scared not to make them. And then, of course, they gave me all the money I wanted for ‘1941,’ which bombed.
“I recovered with ‘Raiders.’ But I’ve always had the freedom to tell whatever story I wanted to tell. And it hasn’t spoiled me. It has just freed me to not hold anyone else responsible for the choices that I make. I can’t credit or blame anybody else for these choices. And I still have a huge appetite for making movies. I have the same energy today than I did when I was 26 and made ‘Jaws.’ I’ve never had a moment — even a private moment — when I could see putting my feet up. That has never even occurred to me. I don’t see an end in sight.”

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/20/3328796/spielberg-hopes-to-reclaim-his.html#storylink=cpy

Advertisements